Private banks defend DPM internal bias

Nov 23, 2015

Wealth managers discuss the perceived conflicts of interest that can arise when using in-house capabilities versus external fund houses for discretionary portfolio management.

Private banks admit they have a bias to their own in-house investment capabilities when providing discretionary portfolio management (DPM) to clients, but say it is for good reason, despite concerns over potential conflicts in this area.

Sign in to read on!

Registered users get 2 free articles in 30 days.

Subscribers have full unlimited access to AsianInvestor

Not signed up? New users get 2 free articles per month, plus a 7-day unlimited free trial.

If you are a senior professional at a large institutional asset owner, such as a sovereign wealth fund or pension fund, please contact [email protected] for further assistance.

Questions?

See here for more information on licences and prices, or contact [email protected]