Balancing bonds and equities has long been considered an adequate method of portfolio diversification, giving investors reasonable expectations for returns across the cycle. Today, low rates and high prices have made this strategy less certain, requiring investors to reconsider risk mitigation and asset allocation.
 
Bonds have traditionally been held for income, capital preservation and diversification benefits. With rates now so close to zero, can bonds still perform these roles? What alternatives might be able to play a similar role?

For the past two decades, the negative correlation between equities and bonds has been a gift for investors looking for diversification. Bonds have acted as a hedge during periods of stock market uncertainty, with weakening sentiment usually coinciding with falling expectations for interest rates and a consequent flight to quality. This mechanism hinges on the ability of yields to move so that bonds can achieve capital gains. However, with yields at such low levels, and little room for further interest rate cuts, the room for further compression is limited.

Persistently low levels of inflation have also contributed to the negative correlation between bonds and equities. Should current stimulus measures feed through into higher inflation, without an equivalent level of growth, this could indicate that something is fundamentally changing. The behaviour of markets is not fixed, although it can take a while for investors to change their habits.

We believe that alternatives are well placed to perform a similar role for investors, in terms of delivering uncorrelated performance throughout the market cycle. There are many alternatives, but an allocation to a ‘multi-strategy’ platform of market-neutral strategies combined with a protection strategy may provide an attractive alternative to a traditional bond/equity allocation, diversifying a portfolio with a greater range of potential sources of alpha.

In your 2020 outlook you stated that you thought volatility was underpriced and could rise in 2020. How did volatility perform in February and March?

Volatility is never a one-way bet, but it was our view at the end of 2019 that it had been significantly underpriced for some time, due to the prevalence of systematic volatility selling programs. The speed and breadth of the spread of COVID-19 in February and March saw a significant and sharp repricing of volatility, with markets understandably stressed and illiquid as economies around the world ground to a halt. Companies were laying off workers at an unprecedented rate, with business survey indicators for economic activity breaching new lows.

Systematic Long Volatility, which is a core component of our protection strategy, invests in equity index put options, with the aim to produce gains when either realised or implied volatility rises. In normal circumstances, such trades can be expensive to run, but underpriced volatility enabled us to build a position that we believed would deliver ‘crisis alpha’ at low carry cost.  Option convexity of this sort performed exceptionally well in past risk events (such as Black Monday in October 1987 and the 2008 global financial crisis) and the scale of the move in volatility – as volatility sellers short-covered – ensured the COVID-19 crisis was no different.

Where are you seeing opportunities to buy or sell volatility today?

While we still see opportunities to buy volatility, the trade is no longer as lucrative. The markets have evolved to a point where the cost of carry (the total costs incurred to take an investment position) on a long volatility position strategy has risen commensurately with the level of current uncertainty, which leads us to look for other strategies to provide uncorrelated returns during such periods.

Our response has been to develop a flexible tail strategy that can be tactically deployed to maintain required protection levels during such times, when holding a long volatility position is expensive. The strategy is designed to capture as wide a series of shock events as possible, rather than just equity market risk, and can be switched off during periods of low volatility.

What’s the biggest risk in the market right now that you don’t think is being accurately priced in?

It is apparent to us that there is a disconnect between financial market pricing and what is going on in the real world at present. Governments and central banks have been complicit in creating this problem, with stimulus measures that have kept markets buoyant, while many industries continue to struggle with the ongoing fallout from COVID-19.

One risk that does not seem correctly priced into markets is the potential for stimulus measures to gain more traction than expected, causing higher inflation and impacting bond yields. Given the secular bull market we’ve had since the early 1980s, today’s investors don’t know how to handle a bear market for fixed income. As such we have taken a sizeable hedge against the risk of bond yields rising in the medium term, and will watch the issue closely.

See alternatives in a different light

To perform differently from the market, you have to invest differently. Learn more about Janus Henderson’s unique insights here.

Issued in Hong Kong by Janus Henderson Investors Hong Kong Limited, licensed and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This advertisement has not been reviewed by the SFC. Issued in Singapore by Janus Henderson Investors (Singapore) Limited Company Registration No. 199700782N, licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

The content herein is produced for information, illustration or discussion purposes only and does not constitute an advertisement or investment advice or an offer to sell, buy or a recommendation for securities in any jurisdiction and do not purport to represent or warrant the outcome of any investment strategy, program or product, other than pursuant to an agreement in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Not all products or services are available in all jurisdictions. Investment involves risk. Past performance cannot guarantee future results.

Janus Henderson Investors is not responsible for any unlawful distribution of this document to any third parties, in whole or in part, or for information reconstructed from this document and do not make any warranties with regards to the results obtained from its use. It is not intended to indicate or imply that current or past results are indicative of future profitability or expectations. In preparing this document, Janus Henderson Investors has reasonable belief to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of all information available from public sources. Unless otherwise indicated, the source for all data is Janus Henderson Investors. 

This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Anything non-factual in nature is an opinion of the author(s), and opinions are meant as an illustration of broader themes, are not an indication of trading intent, and are subject to change at any time due to changes in market or economic conditions. It is not intended to indicate or imply that any illustration/example mentioned is now or was ever held in any portfolio. No forecasts can be guaranteed and there is no guarantee that the information supplied is complete or timely, nor are there any warranties with regard to the results obtained from its use.

Janus Henderson and Knowledge Shared are trademarks of Janus Henderson Group plc or one of its subsidiary entities. © Janus Henderson Group plc.