130/30 flops in Japan

By Jame DiBiasio | 2 July 2008
Keywords: bgi | ubs | ssga | axa
Subscriber Content Preview.
Subscribe now for full access or call us now on +852 2122 5222.

One problem is how to fit active extension mandates into legacy asset allocations, suggesting that support for these quant products might come from new institutions elsewhere.

2008 was supposed to be the year when the giant pension funds of Japan began to experiment with active extension structures.

So far, it hasn’t happened. And while fund managers flogging these quant products say it’s just a matter of time, the possibility that 130/30 strategies and their ilk never gain traction is something to consider.

Active extension structures, also known as 130/30 strategies and sometimes referred to ‘hedge funds lite’, are usually quantitative-based means of adding shorts to traditionally long-only equity mandates. They are meant to provide enhanced ...
To continue reading this article, subscribe now or call us now on +852 2122 5222.
You need a subscription to view this article
Articles older than 48 hours are available to subscribers only.

Log in below or buy a subscription to enjoy unlimited access to AsianInvestor.net's quickly growing 7,000 article database.
 
 
 
Polls
What trend should we focus on in the next AsianInvestor/FinanceAsia debt investor conference?



   |   View results
The rapid development of the renminbi-denominated debt market
  62%
 
The fallout from the European sovereign-debt crisis
  12%
 
The pipeline of Indonesian bond issuers
  10%
 
Mainstreaming of sukuks for global and non-Islamic investors
  16%
TOTAL VOTES: 50

 
WEBCASTS
On Demand Webcasts
Magazine
Asian Investor Magazine
AsianInvestor
July, 2010