AsianInvestor Magazine

Issue: September 2014

Arbitraging rules is risky
Asia is deregulating asset management, which is good news. Many regulatory authorities are keen to support and grow their industries, and to help investors. But piecemeal reforms can throw curveballs. Asset managers and service providers need to check if an opportunity is actually a trap - if the reform is not sufficiently harmonised across other regulators.

There are plenty of examples of governments proactivly supporting investors or the funds industry. Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand have unveiled an Asean funds passport scheme (see page 60). Malaysia has just permitted full foreign ownership of onshore unit-trust firms (see page 8). Taiwan has relaxed rules to expand the scope of financial products and services via offshore banking units (OBUs), which is meant to attract overseas money and build a wealth management hub (see page 28).

The biggest deregulator of them all has been, of course, China. It is promulgating an alphabet soup of acronymed pilot programmes, many of which are linked to internationalising the renminbi. The Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect scheme – due by October – is another welcome addition (see page 64), and may be seen as a precursor to mutual funds recognition wth Hong Kong.

But in many markets, including China and India, regulation of the investments business is fragmented, and regulators sometimes get too far ahead of their peers, which can land the industry in hot water. We saw this a few years ago when India’s securities regulator changed commission rules without consulting with the insurance regulator, a move that did great damage to the funds business.

The latest example is in China, however - which is not surprising given the overall level of financial deregulation taking place there. It has separate regulators for securities, banking and insurance, which sometimes appear to use policy to fight their own turf wars, rather than to benefit their consumers. A more charitable view is that they are simply bad at coordinating. The result can be the same, though, for unwary financial service providers: trouble.

Subsidiaries of Value Partners Goldstate, Wanjia and Huachen Asset Mirae have had to disclose potential product defaults (see page 62) over businesses engaged in segregated accounts. These subsidiaries of long-only mutual fund businesses bolted on new activities allowed by the securities regulator in 2012 that was never coordinated with the banking regulator. The relaxation was intended to let fund houses compete with trust firms, which fall under the banking regulator, by allowing them to operate with less supervision and less capital. Now the banking regulator is applying its more stringent rules to these businesses, catching them short.

The lesson for fund managers operating in China (and, indeed, anywhere) is that piecemeal reforms outside of a national agenda need to be scrutinised. Regulatory arbitrage can reap dividends – and it can also backfire.

Leigh Powell
Editor

This month
Contents

04    On the move
Private bank hires reflect rising trend; Aviva Investors overhaul; Pimco names regional heads

08    Regulatory Analysis
Fund managers study merits of Malaysia

10    Regulatory Roundup
China, Europe in fund passport talks; India set for Reits; Sydney poised for RQFII status

12    Data Centre
 Changing cash positions in equity strategies

Asset Owners
14    Here comes the Euro cash
European family offices are opening in Asia in growing numbers to diversify portfolio exposure, among other things.

18    Q&A: Park Min-Ho, chief investment officer of Teachers’ Pension in Korea

20    Roundtable: Investors discuss positioning for bond market risks

26    CIC warns on deal sourcing, pledges to improve;  NSSF boosts use of fund managers

Distributors
28    Taiwan rolls out red carpet
It has widened the scope of products via oversesas banking units. But it must be bold.

30    Q&A: Colin Tipping, investment proposition director at Friends Life

32    Roundtable: Product gatekeepers discuss ways of boosting fund penetration

38    Nomura on Asia wealth buildout; BSI head on BTG deal implications

Fund Managers
40    Is Europe losing its lustre?
With earnings growth yet to arrive, is it time for a technical turn to emerging markets?

45    ETFs and indices special report – see ‘In this issue’

60    Asean passport scheme unveiled; Jokowi faces challenges; HK funds industry posts record AUM

Alternative Investments
62    Prime time in Hong Kong
Prime brokers are investing in systems to trade China stocks in Hong Kong, but face certain issues.

66    Q&A: Kim Soomin, partner at Unison Capital

68    Ex-GSAM exec joins Soros spinout; GoldenTree opens in Singapore; Newedge building in prime broking

Asset Services
70    Call for clarity on new OTC rules
Uncertainty remains over compliance obligations for mandatory reporting.

72    Operations manager: Cory Chan, E Fund Management

74    Tahnoon Pasha building family office; Stock Connect risks flagged

74    Trader talk: Scott Treloar, Vulpes Investment

76    Bookend
The Rise of the New East:Business strategies for success in a world of increasing complexity, by Ben Simpfendorfer

In this issue
ETFs and indices
AsianInvestor’s special report looks at issues around smart beta, active managers moving into
passive strategies, and India’s ETF industry.

Quick Poll

The withdrawal of bank market-makers in bond trading will:





« View results

Previous polls ››

Drive investors to buy and hold
  12%
 
Exacerbate volatility, but no more
  24%
 
Lead to crisis in corporate credit
  12%
 
Cause an emerging market blow-up
  6%
 
The issue is being overplayed
  47%
TOTAL VOTES: 17
Comment on this

« Back

Previous polls ››

September 2014 Magazine
AsianInvestor Magazine

What's in this issue

European family offices set up in Asia
Private bank fund selection focus
Time for a technical turn to emerging markets?
HK-Shanghai Stock Connect: key issues